Yes, it’s almost 2017 and I still use Rhythmbox to reproduce my music when I am using my computer. He’s 16 years old but I consider it much better than the brand new Gnome Music for at least 4 reasons.
- Rhythmbox is less resource demanding than Gnome Music. I’ve made a very simple test. I opened both of them and checked how much RAM they need through Gnome System Monitor. When idle, Rhythmbox takes 102 MB of RAM while Gnome Music 169. When randomly playing a song, Rhythmbox hikes up to 112 MB while Gnome Music RAM consumption stays the same more or less.
This would not represent a problem in modern computers, endowed with at least 4 GB of RAM but I also thought that fewer resources means less power consumption and that’s vital when you’re running on battery. - Gnome Music uses Tracker to build its database. I have Debian installed in a SSD, a Samsung 840 evo, so I really don’t need file indexing. Gnome Music needs Tracker, the Gnome file indexing app to build its database. That’s a low, considering that Tracker uses a lot of resources: when I had it installed, sometimes, without no reason, it took my CPU at 25%. On the other hand, Rhythmbox just let you select the folder where your music is stored. Also, sometimes tracker behave strangely
- No customization options at all. Crossfading? Nay. Party mode? Nay. LastFM? Nay. Select which plugins to enable? Forget about all this in Gnome Music.
- Plugins are still missing in Gnome Music. Rhythmbox is nice, but thanks to some plugins it can become wonderful. The equalizer, the one that compacts the current playing song bar, the tray icon, the mtp and iPod support. Gnome Music hasn’t any of them, yet.
- Interaction with Brasero. My car is 7 years old, I have the standard car stereo and no way I’m gonna buy a new car stereo because I really don’t need it and in the majority of cases, they look ugly. My standard car stereo doesn’t read mp3 CD and doesn’t have a usb port, so I’m forced to burn old fashioned compilation. Rhythmobx is wonderful for this: you create a playlist and, with a button, it opens Brasero and burn it. Easy.
All this to say that maybe Gnome Music still has a long way to do to become a serious choice to consider for me. Well, at least, with the UI, you nailed it. It’s very clean and beautiful, I’d love to see the wall of album cover at opening.
Ok, next time you see such strange behaviour, report a bug! Lollypop was leaking when creating cover cache (first load or after collection update). Fixed.
https://github.com/gnumdk/lollypop/commit/81a8608e42d8ecc2b4a66a5d5de1b3274a590eb6
LikeLike
But… you are him! You’re the developer behind Lollypop isn’t it?
LikeLike
Rhythmbox also does indexing.. just it has its own db instead of using Tracker.
LikeLike
Yes of course but when it searches for new songs it only searches in the director you set.
LikeLike
Your GNOME Music version is ~way~ too old. We managed to solve many issues both on Tracker and Music during this time.
LikeLike
Nay. 3.22
LikeLike
Hardly so. GNOME Music 3.22 doesn’t have the “All Artists” meta artist, and the Albums view uses the GtkFlowBox widget rather than this GtkIconView-based one. I’m saying this, of course, supposing the screenshots are the actual app that you’re running.
LikeLike
Course not. These are screenshot taken from internet. When I decided to put pictures in this article, well, for gnome music it was too late 🙂
LikeLike
Another option is Lollypop 😉
http://gnumdk.github.io/lollypop-web/
LikeLike
Lollypop? 835 MB ram taken to play song? seriously?
LikeLike
Lol, 835Mio… Less than 100 here with 25000 tracks…
LikeLike
Don’t know why… What distribution are you on?
LikeLike
LikeLike